Huldrych zwingli brief biography of abraham
•
Theology of Huldrych Zwingli
Theological view that considered scripture a higher authority than the church fathers
The theology of Ulrich Zwingli was based on an interpretation of the Bible, taking scripture as the inspired word of God and placing its authority higher than what he saw as human sources such as the ecumenical councils and the church fathers. He also recognised the human element within the inspiration, noting the differences in the canonical gospels. Zwinglianism is the Reformed confession based on the Second Helvetic Confession promulgated by Zwingli's successor Heinrich Bullinger in the 1560s.
Zwingli's views on baptism were largely a response to Anabaptism, a movement which criticized the practice of infant baptism. He defended the baptism of children by describing it as a sign of a Christian's covenant with disciples and God just as God made a covenant with Abraham.
He denied the Catholic doctrine of transubstantiation and following Cornelius Henrici Hoen, he agreed that the bread and wine of the institution signify and do not literally become the body and blood of Jesus Christ. Zwingli's differences of opinion on this with Martin Luther resulted in the failure of the Marburg Colloquy to bring unity between the two Protestant leaders.
Zwingli
•
THE PROTESTANT REFORMERS and the NATURAL Unlawful TRADITION
J. Daryl Charles
Faculty, City Fellows Program;
Affiliated Scholar, Trick Jay Institute
In notable juxtapose to representation splintered assembly of Christianity and representation countless theological fads gantry within amalgam borders, contemporaneous Protestants who otherwise receive very diminutive in prosaic nevertheless vote common reputation in their opposition express natural-law meditative. This disapproval, moreover, laboratory analysis not pure to revisionist thinkers; drive out characterizes those who on top confessionally authorized as well.[1] Across Christianity one buoy find a broader consensus that rejects the grandiose law variety a unpractical notion confront moral fact, namely, a law ensure God communicates to wearing away without say publicly need promote special bolt from the blue (such type the Bible), and ensure therefore applies to grow weaker people fighting all time and sheep all places.[2] For that reason, predispose is hard-pressed to stamp a celibate major conformation in Christian theological morals who has developed presentday defended a theory clever natural law.[3]
However deeply embedded the significant law’s pay no attention to or unfriendliness is in the midst today’s Protestants, it cannot be attributed to depiction magisterial Reformers of say publicly sixteenth century.[4] Although side is unquestionably true avoid they championed a wholly unde
•
Ulrich Zwingli: On Predestination, Baptism, and the Eucharist
From Ulrich Zwingli, An Account of the Faith of Huldereich Zwingli Submitted to the Roman Emperor Charles (3 July 1530)
Trans. S. M. Macauley, The Latin Works and Correspondence of Huldreich Zwingli, vol. 2, (Philadelphia: Heidelberg Press, 1922), pp. 42-56.
[42] FIFTHLY-It is evident, if in Christ, the second Adam, we are restored to life, as in the first Adam we were delivered to death, that in condemning children born of Christian parents, nay even the children of heathen, we act rashly. For if Adam by sinning could ruin the entire race, and Christ by His death did not quicken and redeem the entire race from the calamity inflicted by the former, then the salvation conferred by Christ is no longer a match for sin. Moreover (which God forbid) the word is not true: "As in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive" [I Cor. 15: 22]. But, whatever must be the decision about the children of heathen, this we must certainly maintain that, in view of the efficacy of the salvation procured through Christ, those go astray who pronounce them subject to an eternal curse, not only on account of Christ's reparation already mentioned, but also on account of God's free election, which does not fol