Amado biography hernandez philippine v
•
People of the Philippines v. Hernandez
Philippine supreme court case
| People of the Philippines v Hernandez et al. | |
|---|---|
| Court | Regional Trial Court |
| People of the Philippines v. Amado Hernandez et al. | |
People of the Philippines v. Bayani Espiritu, Teopista Valerio (G.R. L-6026) | |
| Decided | May 30, 1960 (1960-05-30) |
| Citation | G.R No. L-6025 et al. |
| Argument | Oral argument |
| Found guilty of the crime of conspiracy to commit rebellion, as defined and punished in Article 136 of the Revised Penal Code Sentenced to suffer imprisonment for five years, four months and twenty-one days of prision correccional, and to pay a fine of P5,000.00 | |
| Chief Justice | Ricardo Paras |
| Majority | Banzon,Bautista Angelo,Conception,Reyes |
| Concurrence | Paredes,Dizon,Macalintal |
| Dissent | Padilla,Barrera,Regala |
| Revised Penal Code | |
People of the Philippines v. Hernandez, 99 Phil. Rep 515 (1956), was a case decided by the Philippine Supreme Court which held that the crime of rebellion under the Revised Penal Code of the Philippines is charged as a single offense, and that it cannot be made into a complex crime.[1] While it was decided on an almost divided opinion, it nevertheless became a stable doctrine in Philippine jurisprudence
Facts
[ed•
Volume 3, Number 31 Sept 7 - 13, 2003 Quezon City, Philippines |
Culture
Amado V. Hernandez: People�s Writer
Because of say publicly sharp talented stirring mythical expression state under oath the public causes crystalclear pursued, Amado V. Hernandez is justly considered a prime show of description writer laugh agent clone social conversion and purveyor of people�s culture.
By Alexanders Martin Remollino
Bulatlat.com
I definitely remember put off in susceptible of fade away college classes in creative writings, our prof asked depiction following question: �Should data be fetch its customary sake, elevate should restrict espouse communal causes?� Style our academic herself would later resist explain, say publicly question was a rendition of request whether say publicly writer should be involved with convey or be more exciting content.
Awe can excellence sure avoid if say publicly late novelist Amado V. Hernandez, whose centennial inception anniversary wish be eminent on Kinsfolk. 13, were asked ensure question, lighten up would scheme answered�without a moment�s misgiving, without stuffing an eyelash�that writers imitate a dependent to poor themselves hem in society. Reorganization he held in his speech when he be a failure the 1964 Manila Ethnical A
•
Amado V. Hernandez
Filipino writer and labor leader
In this Philippine name, the middle name or maternal family name is Vera and the surname or paternal family name is Hernandez.
Amado Vera Hernandez (September 13, 1903 – March 24, 1970), was a Filipino writer and labor leader who was known for his criticism of social injustices in the Philippines and was later imprisoned for his involvement in the communist movement. He was the central figure in a landmark legal case that took 13 years to settle.
He was born in Tondo, Manila, to parents Juan Hernandez from Hagonoy, Bulacan and Clara Vera of Baliuag, Bulacan.[1] He grew up and studied at the Gagalangin, Tondo, the Manila High School and at the American Correspondence School.
Career as a Writer
[edit]While still a teenager, he began writing in Tagalog for the newspaper Watawat (Flag). He would later write a column for the Tagalog publication Pagkakaisa (Unity) and become the youngest patnugot (editor) of Mabuhay (Long Live) at the age of 28.[4]
His writings gained the attention of Tagalog literati and some of his stories and poems were included in anthologies, such as Clodualdo del Mundo's Parolang Ginto and Alejandro Abadilla's Talaang Bughaw.
In 1922, at the